|
|
• View
the Full Text of the Bill
SB 1799 -- The Heritage Tree Preservation Act
PURPOSE OF THE BILL
The Heritage Tree Preservation Act establishes a new class of trees—heritage
trees—on non-federal forestlands in California and calls for these
trees to be preserved in perpetuity.
The Heritage Trees protected under this act represent only about one-half
of one percent of trees standing on California’s non-federal forestland.
PROBLEM & NEED FOR THE BILL
97% of California’s old-growth trees have been logged. Today,
there are so few old-growth trees left in California that we need to
preserve every one that remains.
There are currently no state or federal statutes that protect these
trees. They often remain because they were uneconomical to remove or
were out of reach of prior forestry technologies. They are now at threat
by modern forestry methods.
These trees are all within the oldest one percent of California trees,
representing a historic continuum from 1850 CE back to perhaps 2700
BCE.
It is critical that we preserve these trees in order to reestablish
species and age diversity in California’s forests.
WHAT THIS BILL WOULD DO
The Heritage Tree Preservation Act mandates that trees that were alive
in the year California became a state (1850 CE) and that meet species-specific
minimum diameter requirements shall be preserved.
The Act protects Giant Sequoias, Coast Redwoods, Douglas-firs, Port
Orford Cedars and other species on non-federal forestland.
The Act makes provisions for land owners who already protect large,
old trees in compliance with an existing timber harvest plan approved
by an independent certification organization.
The Act will strengthen California’s economy and environment by
increasing property values, decreasing risk of fire and insect infestation,
cleaning our air and water, providing habitat for endangered species,
and contributing to the sequestration of carbon emissions.
BILL STATUS
Introduced 2/24/06
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is “old growth”?
One common internationally used definition is “trees standing
since prior to the onset of large scale industrial logging in an area.”
This definition works particularly well in regions with species that
are long lived. Industrial logging in California began around statehood
in 1850 and shortly thereafter. The State Board of Equalization defines
“old-growth trees” as being 150 years old.
“Old growth” has become a vernacular term, not a term of
forestry or biologic jargon even though biology and, sadly, forestry
are factors in old growth.
It is not useful and is disingenuous to co-define “old growth”
with “late seral”. Doing so removes the definition of “old
growth” from the generally understood meaning and leaves us without
a terminology that describes old growth as distinct from late seral
or includes those non-forestry values that must be evaluated under CEQA
. There is room for separate definitions of “late seral,”
“ancient forest” or “old growth stand,” and
“old growth.”
An “old-growth tree” does not mean an “old-growth
stand,” nor does it mean a tree of any young age within an old-growth
stand.
An old-growth tree does not cease to be “old growth” if
the trees around it are logged.
An old-growth Valley oak is “old growth” even though it
is not part of a stand.
Many Giant sequoias do not occur in the density to meet some stand based
definitions.
There are Bristlecone pines on the periphery of the Methuselah Grove
that are over 3,000 years old that would not be included as “old
growth” under some stand based definitions.
A tree does not have to stop putting on wood or be decadent to be “old
growth.”
How many of the old-growth trees do we need to protect?
When there is a large percentage of old growth trees of a particular
species, spread over a large area, the pressure on preservation is lower.
When the remaining old growth trees are down to the last few percent,
the need to preserve all that remain is high. Several of the species
covered in this bill are nearly endemic - They are mostly found only
in California. Take old-growth Coast redwoods: Perhaps 3/4 of all remaining
old-growth Coast redwoods are protected. Yet the number that remain
is so low that old-growth dependant species are heading towards extinction
for lack of habitat. Not only can we not afford to lose any more old-growth
Coast redwoods, we need to find a way to recruit additional habitat
before the dependant species die off. We cannot do that without protecting
the remaining old growth trees. There are so few old-growth
trees left in California that we need to preserve every one that remains.
The Campaign Needs Your Help - Get Involved
|
 |